Compare ShieldX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security
 | Branden Emia Senior Systems Engineer at Larry H. Miller Management Corporation |
 | Maurizio Testa Security Engineer/Architect at Telecom Italia |
Find out what your peers are saying about ShieldX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We were able to see what devices are talking to each other, giving us more visibility."
"It has helped us tighten our security posture. Now, staff can only access things that they should be accessing."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic scaling. With its microservices, it scales both up and down, depending on traffic and throughput."
"The UI was also one of the huge selling points. My web development manager was blown away with the detail and the granularity that you can get out of the UI. It is a very strong and informative UI, with the amount of data it provides."
"The most valuable features are web security, email filtering, and content filtering."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"The most valuable feature is the virtual patching."
"In terms of valuable features, I would say its intrusion prevention. Each and every IP connecting to the server gets scanned so we know everyone who is accessing our server and we can block whichever IP's do not belong to us at the firewall."
"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."
"This product offers good protection against many types of malware."
"Automated virtual patching is a good feature."
"It integrates well with the cloud; for example, AWS, and Google Cloud Provider."
Cons
"I would like better reports and in-depth reporting."
"We are having some issues with their LDAP and integrating it with the Active Directory. We can't seem to set it up."
"There should be a bit more customer care, with regular review meetings on it or regular reports. It would be nice to have a quarterly or biannual review of what ShieldX has blocked."
"The support for email protection can be improved."
"The client can show as offline sometimes, and that becomes a bit difficult for troubleshooting. We end up basically redeploying the client. This is something that could be improved in the future."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"As for what could be improved, I think it should come with an XDR facility without any extra cost. They're always releasing new features, but we need to pay extra for them."
"The situation with the currency in Turkey makes this solution a little bit on the expensive side, and if it were lowered then it would be more competitive."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
"Requires simplification, a fair amount of trouble shooting required."
"The problem with this solution is that if you go on large sites you have to have an external database, which would increase the cost."
"For other security professions who are looking for something which is low in cost that does microsegmentation, they should look at ShieldX. It might not be the big name out there, but it does everything that you are looking for in microsegmentation at a very low price."
"For a three-year deal we paid £55,000 plus tax... But, and this is a big "but," this was over two years ago. ShieldX had only just hit the market. We were the first company in Europe to buy ShieldX."
"The cost is approximately six thousand Qatari Riyal ($1650 USD) per user."
"Some of our customers complain about the cost of this solution."
"It's more expensive than other solutions, such as Sophos and Kaspersky, as an endpoint solution."
"The solution is considerably cheaper than other similar solutions."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The most valuable feature of this solution is the virtual path function, which is the reason we chose to implement it.
Top Answer: The solution is considerably cheaper than other similar solutions.
Top Answer: I would like to see an EDR function for the servers, as that would be useful for us. Detection and Response directly to the servers.
Views
3,421
Comparisons
657
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
1,687
Rating
10.0
Views
22,427
Comparisons
17,298
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
463
Rating
8.9
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
APEIRO, ShieldX APEIRO
Deep Security
The ShieldX Elastic Security Platform dynamically scales to deliver comprehensive and consistent controls to protect data centers, cloud infrastructure, applications and data no matter where they are or where they go to make the cloud more secure than on-premise deployments. Our frictionless approach leverages agentless technology as well as the ShieldX Adaptive Intention Engine which autonomously translates and enforces intention into a set of comprehensive controls - microsegmentation, firewall, IPS and more - making security the easiest thing you do in the cloud.
The Trend Micro Cloud and Data Center Security solution protects applications and data and prevents business disruptions, while helping meet regulatory compliance. Whether you are focused on securing physical virtual, cloud, or hybrid environments, Trend Micro provides the advanced server security you need with the Trend Micro™ Deep Security™ platform.
Learn more about ShieldX
Learn more about Trend Micro Deep Security
Iowa State University
Rush University Medical Center, Guess? Inc., Mazda Motor Logistics Europe, MEDHOST, KSC Commercial Internet Co., Ricoh Company Ltd., Square Enix, SoftBank Telecom, Telecom Italia, United Way of Greater Atlanta, A&W Food Services of Canada
Computer Software Company84%
Government4%
Comms Service Provider3%
Insurance Company1%
Healthcare Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Manufacturing Company15%
Computer Software Company10%
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider21%
Government6%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about ShieldX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ShieldX is ranked 6th in Cloud and Data Center Security with 2 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 3rd in Cloud and Data Center Security with 11 reviews. ShieldX is rated 10.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ShieldX writes "Proactively monitors, blocks, and reports what it has blocked; and self-updates meaning there is zero maintenance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Each and every IP connecting to the server gets scanned so we can block whichever IPs do not belong to us at the firewall". ShieldX is most compared with VMware NSX, Guardicore Centra, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform and Fortinet FortiGate, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Symantec End-User Endpoint Security, Carbon Black CB Defense and Microsoft Defender Antivirus. See our ShieldX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.