Siebel vs TOA Technologies ETAdirect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
154 views|119 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
139 views|47 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Siebel and TOA Technologies ETAdirect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Field Service Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
6th
Views
154
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
Views
139
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ETAdirect
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available
TOA Technologies is the leading provider of cloud-based mobile workforce management applications. ETAdirect improves customer service while dramatically reducing operational costs and delivering immediate return on investment. As the industry's only complete on-demand solution using predictive, time-based analytics, ETAdirect reduces customer wait times and increasing field workforce efficiency. TOA's system deploys quickly, is highly configurable and easily integrates with existing systems.
Sample Customers
Hover Automotive India, Smiles, Bouygues Telecom, Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, Lawn Tennis Association Boosts Tennis, Southwest Airlines
Virgin Media, Cox Communications
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Siebel is ranked 6th in Field Service Management while TOA Technologies ETAdirect is ranked 9th in Field Service Management. Siebel is rated 7.6, while TOA Technologies ETAdirect is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Siebel writes "We're able to customize the business rules with code and to integrate it with middleware applications to manage the rules externally. The interactions with social networks can’t be managed with it". On the other hand, Siebel is most compared with Salesforce CPQ and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas TOA Technologies ETAdirect is most compared with .

See our list of best Field Service Management vendors.

We monitor all Field Service Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.