Compare Signavio Process Manager vs. webMethods Integration Server

Signavio Process Manager is ranked 14th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 5th in Business Process Management with 13 reviews. Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Signavio Process Manager writes "User-friendly and has an easy implementation process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Signavio Process Manager is most compared with ARIS BPM, Camunda BPM and Visio, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus. See our Signavio Process Manager vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio Process Manager vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it.A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility.

Read more »

A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.

Read more »

Cons
If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you.It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully.It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient.

Read more »

The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This solution provides really great value for the money.Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans.

Read more »

It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,953
Comparisons
2,870
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
954
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
15,099
Comparisons
10,475
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
309
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Signavio Process Editor
Learn
Signavio
Software AG
Overview
The Signavio Process Manager is an intuitive BPM solution for professional process modeling. Whether you want to create current-state documentation or target concepts, the Signavio Process Manager is your best choice for process modeling. Thanks to innovative web technology, you can get started right away and include your colleagues in collaborative design.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Signavio Process Manager
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
DHL, Transurban, Prudential Life Assurance, Zalando, T-Systems, Audi BKK, 1&1, BugattiFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Financial Services Firm20%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Comms Service Provider7%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Pharma/Biotech Company11%
Maritime Company11%
Logistics Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Comms Service Provider7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Signavio Process Manager vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email