OpenText Silk Central vs TestLodge comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
324 views|224 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
TestLodge Logo
153 views|111 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and TestLodge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."
  • More OpenText Silk Central Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    20th
    Views
    324
    Comparisons
    224
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    22nd
    Views
    153
    Comparisons
    111
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
    Learn More
    Overview
    Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

    TestLodge is an online test case management tool designed to be far simpler than traditional software by only providing the essentials to get the job done well. The system focuses on helping you create your test plans, input your requirements, create and manage your test suites and cases along with allowing you to easily perform multiple test runs and generate reports.

    TestLodge integrates with the majority of today’s leading issue tracking tools so when a test fails in TestLodge, a ticket is automatically created saving the tester the time of creating one manually.

    Sample Customers
    AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
    Actual Analytics, Infinite Touch, Asset Management International, Usablenet, Sorenson Media, Dacuda, Harvest, RedGiant.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Transportation Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while TestLodge is ranked 22nd in Test Management Tools. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while TestLodge is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas TestLodge is most compared with TestRail.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.