We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"I face no challenges or stability issues."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."
"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"This tool has test data management capability along with test management."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"I would like a better user interface."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."
"It would be of great help if they can fix the loading or performance issues. Sometimes, when I create the test case folder and test cases, it feels like it has loading or performance issues. When passing the objects, we can't sometimes find the exact element. We need to find out that exact location and just give the path for that, and then it works. In the pipeline, when creating Jenkins, we create the list execution for passing the execution list to the commander. I feel it is a bit late, by a fraction of seconds. I first thought it could be my mistake or a setting issue, but I worked on that, and it's not a mistake or a setting issue."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 96 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.