Anonymous UserProject Manager at a tech services company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."
Earn 20 points
Transform your organization and produce high quality software, quickly. Get to market faster, reduce risk and accelerate time to revenue. Future proof your test management investment with a platform that easily configures to your evolving processes.
Legacy systems have no place in your agile business. They hinder more than they help. It is time to retire those legacy test management solutions with today’s technology, integrations, deployment models and a simplified licensing model.
Measure. Analyze. Share. Elevate visibility across the organization. Make well-informed business decisions with real-time information that comes in from across your globally distributed teams.
Silk Central is ranked 20th in Test Management Tools while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 8th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. Silk Central is rated 0.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Useful for test case management and automation integration, but it should have a utility for automation integration". Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, TestRail by Gurock and Tricentis qTest, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, TFS and PractiTest.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.