Compare Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Silk Central is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 1 review. Silk Central is rated 8.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Silk Central writes "A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "It has integration with test automation tools. Needs support for the agile and BDD approaches". Silk Central is most compared with Micro Focus ALM, Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with TestRail by Gurock, Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Hiptest. See our Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Central Logo
1,587 views|812 comparisons
Zephyr Enterprise Logo
5,879 views|4,293 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent.

Read more »

It has integration with test automation tools.

Read more »

Cons
We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end.

Read more »

We would like support for the agile and behavior-driven development (BDD) approaches.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
Views
1,587
Comparisons
812
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
643
Avg. Rating
8.0
11th
Views
5,879
Comparisons
4,293
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
335
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Borland Silk Central, Micro Focus Silk Central
Learn
Micro Focus
Zephyr Enterprise
Overview
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.

Transform your organization and produce high quality software, quickly. Get to market faster, reduce risk and accelerate time to revenue. Future proof your test management investment with a platform that easily configures to your evolving processes.

Legacy systems have no place in your agile business. They hinder more than they help. It is time to retire those legacy test management solutions with today’s technology, integrations, deployment models and a simplified licensing model.

Measure. Analyze. Share. Elevate visibility across the organization. Make well-informed business decisions with real-time information that comes in from across your globally distributed teams.


Offer
Learn more about Silk Central
Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise
Sample Customers
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin UniversityHyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Central vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email