Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs SmartBear TestComplete which is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ. See our Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

Silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
27,169
Comparisons
13,520
Reviews
15
Followers
2,122
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Micro focus logo
Compared 23% of the time.
Oaqp0rmd 400x400
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
SmartBear Software
  • Vendor 7999 screenshot 1524947464
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
35%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Transportation Company
9%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
40%
Large Enterprise
45%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
26%
Large Enterprise
58%
Silk test vs. smartbear testcomplete report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs SmartBear TestComplete and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
270,013 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email