Compare Silk Test vs. Telerik Test Studio

Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. Silk Test is rated 7.0, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "A straightforward initial setup, easy to scale and a good user interface". Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio and Micro Focus UFT One.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
5,455 views|3,688 comparisons
Telerik Test Studio Logo
2,699 views|2,156 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Telerik Test Studio? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.The statistics that are available are very good.The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.

More Silk Test Pros »

The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface.

More Telerik Test Studio Pros »

Cons
The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are.The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies.The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.

More Silk Test Cons »

The charts need to be more detailed and customizable.

More Telerik Test Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

More Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
5,455
Comparisons
3,688
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
625
Avg. Rating
7.0
24th
Views
2,699
Comparisons
2,156
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
165
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Learn
Micro Focus
Progress
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.
Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Telerik Test Studio
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG TechnologiesFox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company50%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company6%
Retailer4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer7%
Construction Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.