Compare Silk Test vs. TestingWhiz

Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while TestingWhiz which is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. Silk Test is rated 7.6, while TestingWhiz is rated 0. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ, whereas TestingWhiz is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Ranorex Studio.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
10,020 views|3,576 comparisons
TestingWhiz Logo
673 views|532 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use TestingWhiz? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
10,020
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
7.5
31st
Views
673
Comparisons
532
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Micro Focus
Cygnet Infotech
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about TestingWhiz
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG TechnologiesVerizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
359,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email