Compare Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca

Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis Tosca which is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews. Silk Test is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "I would recommend it to a team which does not have much reliance on technical testers but more with business testers". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
10,020 views|3,576 comparisons
Tricentis Tosca Logo
67,230 views|14,546 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.

Read more »

It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority.Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications.Object Identification Wizard.Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies.Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface.

Read more »

Cons
The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.

Read more »

Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation.Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.It needs better integration with JIRA.I would like a better user interface.Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail.Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use.Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked.We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc.Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
10,020
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
7.5
2nd
Views
67,230
Comparisons
14,546
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
371
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Micro Focus
Tricentis
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.

Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.

Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.

Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Manufacturing Company12%
Insurance Company12%
Healthcare Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company22%
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise59%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise77%
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email