Compare Silk Test vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT)

Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while UFT Pro (LeanFT) is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Silk Test is rated 7.2, while UFT Pro (LeanFT) is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT Pro (LeanFT) writes "Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations ". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ, whereas UFT Pro (LeanFT) is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and Tricentis Tosca. See our Silk Test vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
5,101 views|3,581 comparisons
UFT Pro (LeanFT) Logo
6,367 views|3,708 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
365,423 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.

Read more »

One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE.

Read more »

Cons
The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.

Read more »

The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
365,423 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
5,101
Comparisons
3,581
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
606
Avg. Rating
7.3
15th
Views
6,367
Comparisons
3,708
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
960
Avg. Rating
6.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerMicro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about UFT Pro (LeanFT)
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG TechnologiesWalmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company17%
Healthcare Company17%
Consumer Goods8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Software R&D Company20%
Healthcare Company14%
Individual & Family Service10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
365,423 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email