Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP)

Silk Test is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 16 reviews. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
301,872 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP)

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.The licensing and pricing model is confusing.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
301,872 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
8,050
Comparisons
3,515
Reviews
2
Followers
319
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
46,964
Comparisons
18,402
Reviews
16
Followers
1,489
Avg. Rating
8.2
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
See more UFT (QTP) competitors »
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Website/Video
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Null Vendor
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
36%
Retailer
14%
Insurance Company
14%
Healthcare Company
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
43%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Healthcare Company
5%
Pharma/Biotech Company
4%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
301,872 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email