Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP)

Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
8,414 views|3,409 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
48,817 views|17,475 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
310,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
310,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
8,414
Comparisons
3,409
Reviews
2
Followers
281
Avg. Rating
7.0
1st
Views
48,817
Comparisons
17,475
Reviews
13
Followers
1,403
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company24%
Healthcare Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Software R&D Company11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company43%
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company5%
Pharma/Biotech Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
310,151 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email