Silk Test vs UFT (QTP)

Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 23 reviews. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify. See our Silk Test vs UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Silk test vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,560 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs UFT (QTP)

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.The licensing and pricing model is confusing.It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly.

Read more »

Silk test vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,560 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
40,767
Comparisons
21,900
Reviews
23
Followers
2,363
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 19% of the time.
Smartbear%20software logo
Compared 14% of the time.
Worksoft twitter logo reasonably small
Compared 9% of the time.
See more UFT (QTP) competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
Micro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
31%
Insurance Company
19%
Healthcare Company
8%
Software R&D Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
44%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Pharma/Biotech Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
18%
Large Enterprise
69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
7%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
82%
Silk test vs. uft %28qtp%29 report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs UFT (QTP) and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
269,560 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email