Compare Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP)

Silk Test is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Silk Test is rated 7.4, while UFT (QTP) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
5,173 views|3,640 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,519 views|15,615 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.

Read more »

Cons
The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
16th
Views
5,173
Comparisons
3,640
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
628
Avg. Rating
7.3
2nd
Views
25,519
Comparisons
15,615
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,042
Avg. Rating
8.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn More About UFT

Fill out the form to view the report

Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company51%
Comms Service Provider15%
Insurance Company11%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise55%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email