Silk Test vs Visual Studio Test Professional

Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs Visual Studio Test Professional which is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "It needs to be independent and user-friendly". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, LoadRunner and UFT (QTP).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs Visual Studio Test Professional

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
4,782
Comparisons
3,951
Reviews
1
Followers
548
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
See more Visual Studio Test Professional competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
Microsoft
  • Vendor 7622 screenshot 1524943927
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesTransport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
No Data Available
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
269,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email