Silk Test vs Wikidi Testomato

Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews vs Wikidi Testomato which is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. Wikidi Testomato is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Visual Studio Test Professional and Testdroid.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Use Wikidi Testomato? Share your opinion.
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs Wikidi Testomato

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
157
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Followers
482
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Tricentislogo
Compared 7% of the time.
Opswabpw 400x400
Compared 5% of the time.
See more Wikidi Testomato competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerTestomato
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1527352786
Wikidi
  • Vendor 29212 screenshot 1524955537
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.Wikidi Testomato monitors your website for problems that make your business vulnerable. It has Easy-to-read reports that tracks site performance to identify error patterns and prevent future issues, Instant Alerts that runs website checks every 5 minutes and monitors uptime performance every 15 seconds reducing time-to-resolution and Quick Setup that starts running checks in seconds to verify your website is working.
OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Wikidi Testomato
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesJollibee, Wingmen Online Marketing GmbH, Kaymu, Dixi, Toi Toi
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
No Data Available
Functional testing tools report from it central station 2018 04 29 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email