We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Test and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Automation Anywhere (AA) and ReadyAPI.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.