Silk Test vs ZAPTEST

Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs ZAPTEST which is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". The top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "We can write our codes just after the functional docs are prepared, and we can straight away start testing the application in the system testing phase itself". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ. ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, UFT (QTP) and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our Silk Test vs ZAPTEST report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Silk test vs. zaptest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs ZAPTEST and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Silk Test vs ZAPTEST

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Silk test vs. zaptest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs ZAPTEST and others in Functional Testing Tools.
269,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
6,683
Comparisons
3,634
Reviews
4
Followers
757
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
8,555
Comparisons
1,700
Reviews
2
Followers
489
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Micro focus logo
Compared 20% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 17% of the time.
Big logo 400x400
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Big logo 400x400
Compared 29% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 9% of the time.
Micro focus logo
Compared 7% of the time.
See more ZAPTEST competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicro Focus
  • Vendor 7619 screenshot 1521912797
ZAPTEST
  • Vendor 29510 screenshot 1524959006
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewSilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
OFFER
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about ZAPTEST
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesAT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
36%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Non Tech Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
34%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
53%
Silk test vs. zaptest report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs ZAPTEST and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
269,925 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email