Compare Silk Test vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Silk Test is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Zeenyx AscentialTest is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Silk Test is rated 7.4, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "Enables us to have a single test run across multiple sets of data". Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ, whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT (QTP). See our Silk Test vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Test Logo
5,217 views|3,668 comparisons
Zeenyx AscentialTest Logo
2,257 views|486 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.

Read more »

If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice.

Read more »

Cons
The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.

Read more »

I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
Views
5,217
Comparisons
3,668
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Avg. Rating
7.3
16th
Views
2,257
Comparisons
486
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
587
Avg. Rating
10.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk PerformerAscentialTest
Learn
Micro Focus
Zeenyx
Video Not Available
Overview
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Offer
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Zeenyx AscentialTest
Sample Customers
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG TechnologiesTJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Insurance Company12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Retailer5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Silk Test vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
383,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email