We performed a comparison between Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization."The platform’s features for latency mitigation help optimize user experience."
"The most valuable feature of Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect is the boost."
"First and foremost, it enables the customer to deploy high availability connections. This kind of solution enables them to deploy these HA connections for policies mostly automatically. It's a more automated approach than with other vendors."
"The platform is valuable for bandwidth reduction."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution includes features for SD-WAN and WAN such as batch conditioning and optimization."
"The file and data reduction capabilities are very good. Without it, we have a great deal of network congestion."
"The most valuable features of Silver Peak VX is the flexibility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the long-distance performance of the application storage is easy and effective."
"The most valuable features of Silver Peak VX are we can register our customers and they can receive free training and all the solutions features."
"Currently, we encounter challenges in terms of the functioning of compression, deduplication, and other features even after uploading the certificate for encrypted traffic."
"I expect automation in the Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform's next release."
"More technical sessions should be offered for deploying the solution."
"This solution is suitable for small to medium-sized companies. If we have large-sized companies it is better to use Cisco or Palo Alto."
"The license features should improve in the solution. For example, when you purchase VMware, it starts at a low level that has some functionality. When you want to expand, the difference in the price is substantial. I purchased the lower functional version for $4,000, and now if I want to upgrade, they ask me for $80,000. This is a $76,000 difference, there's no logic, but this is VMware."
"In future releases, I would like to see security features, so Aruba might need some firewalls, like other vendors."
"We would like to have better features for path selection. For example, if we know the network is going to go down then we would like to set up an alternate route for data packets in real-time."
"Reporting is something that they can improve on."
"Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform needs to improve integrations with other vendors."
More Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is ranked 13th in WAN Optimization with 1 review while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is ranked 1st in WAN Optimization with 19 reviews. Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization writes "Easy-to-deploy with valuable features for web optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform writes "Flexible, efficient, and responsive support". Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is most compared with , whereas Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Prisma SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud Platform.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
