SmartBear LoadNinja vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
853 views|421 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Progress Software Logo
148 views|95 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SmartBear LoadNinja and Telerik Test Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Load Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SmartBear LoadNinja vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Kapil Tarka
Raghvendra Jyothi
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are happy with the technical support.""SmartBear LoadNinja is easy to use and implement.""It's a very simple tool for performance testing."

More SmartBear LoadNinja Pros →

"The performance and load testing are very good.""Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution.""The way it identifies elements is good.""Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me.""The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

More Telerik Test Studio Pros →

Cons
"On a smaller scale, there will be no budget issues, but as we expand to a larger user base, I believe we will face some pricing challenges.""It needs time to mature.""As we ran the test, we couldn't see the real-time results of how the solution behaved for 200 to 400 virtual users."

More SmartBear LoadNinja Cons →

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable.""Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy.""I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding.""There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test.""It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

More Telerik Test Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Certainly, the cost could be reduced."
  • More SmartBear LoadNinja Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."
  • More Telerik Test Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:SmartBear LoadNinja is easy to use and implement.
    Top Answer:There are different plans, including monthly, half-yearly, annually, and so on. If you require more bandwidth or you want to do more testing, then there are some premium plans also. We have around 100… more »
    Top Answer:SmartBear LoadNinja presented issues around some use cases that we wanted to do. We were using the solution to simulate using a browser and to give some browser access to our use case for multiple… more »
    Top Answer:The way it identifies elements is good.
    Top Answer:Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy. In addition, sometimes, tests used to fail intermittently. These were the two disadvantages.
    Top Answer:Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current code… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    853
    Comparisons
    421
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    629
    Rating
    7.5
    14th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    148
    Comparisons
    95
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    619
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SmartBear LoadComplete
    Learn More
    Overview

    SmartBear LoadNinja is a cloud-based next-generation tool designed to develop and implement automated load tests for web services and web applications. LoadNinja helps organizations test their web server’s performance during tremendous load and will determine scalability and define overall dynamics.

    Load testing is integral in today's aggressive marketplace so that organizations can quickly and easily determine how their web servers will operate during extreme load (requests). LoadNinja intuitively creates load tests using automation developed by documenting past interactions over web pages and reproduces these interactions with hundreds of virtual users (VUs) simultaneously. These tests help organizations fully comprehend what load their websites, pages, etc, can successfully sustain without interruption or downtime.

    LoadNinja provides various metrics, such as CPU usage and traffic generated during each test run. LoadNinja integrates well with many of today’s popular browsers and web servers.

    LoadNinja Testing - How it works:

    • Develop a UI or API test scenario: These are single-instance tests. Each test is representative of an actual application usage process, such as updating client information, making or tracking an order, etc. A UI test replicates the actions of one user on the tested website. An API test replicates the behavior of one client application. Organizations will run these tests numerous times to replicate tremendous load on the specified web application being tested.
    • Load testing scenario: This is the example of an organization’s load test. The scenario will integrate one of many single-instance tests, designate the number of virtual users (VUs), advance load parameters, and other specific metrics.
    • Work the scenario: LoadNinja processes the load tests in the cloud and provides cloud machines automatically for the entirety of the test. During a UI test, each VU utilizes a real browser to conduct a test action to interact with the organization's web applications appropriately mimicking real user responses, including “think times” and experiencing client-side scripts. Throughout the entire process, LoadNinja will create real-time charts so that organizations are able to best monitor test metrics and the overall wellbeing of the application.
    • Study the results: Once the test is finished, LoadNinja will create a report detailing all the critical performance metrics gathered during the test. This report will give a good determination of an organization’s server capabilities and if it meets the established SLA.

    Top Features:

    • Real-life load tests, simulated real user actions: LoadNinja will document real user actions on the site to be tested, then replicate those actions with the assistance of hundreds or even thousands of virtual users. This ensures load tests are as close to real-life processes as possible. LoadNinja does not just test one URL of a website; it replicates the entire user experience. This is one feature that differentiates LoadNinja from most other solutions in the marketplace.
    • Real browsers, real user replication: LoadNInja replays the documented traffic from real browsers. Every VU utilizes its own browser; there is no overlapping. LoadNinja precisely replicates each user action. Whatever code or script is used, it will be completely tested for every page.
    • Develop tests quickly and easily: Organizations are able to quickly develop UI tests by documenting user actions in the embedded browser. API tests can be developed using the embedded request editor. There is no coding, downloading, or installation of browser plugins necessary.
    • Scales easily: LoadNinja is a cloud solution; there is no need to designate drive space or add extra “agent” devices to save recorded scripts or test results. LoadNinja does it all intuitively and automatically in the cloud. Organizations simply choose the determined amount of VUs desired to replicate, and begin. It’s that simple!

    Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.
    Sample Customers
    Falafel Software
    Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer9%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    SmartBear LoadNinja vs. Telerik Test Studio
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear LoadNinja vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SmartBear LoadNinja is ranked 13th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 14th in Load Testing Tools with 5 reviews. SmartBear LoadNinja is rated 7.4, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SmartBear LoadNinja writes "Easy to use with good documentation and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "Very good performance and load testing capabilities". SmartBear LoadNinja is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Performance, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Tricentis Tosca. See our SmartBear LoadNinja vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.