SmartBear TestComplete vs. SoapUI Pro

As of February 2019, SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews vs SoapUI Pro which is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". The top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "With this solution, we were able to develop tests about 3x faster than we did with Java". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Ranorex Studio, UFT (QTP) and Katalon Studio. SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Parasoft SOAtest and Katalon Studio. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. SoapUI Pro report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear TestComplete Logo
33,892 views|12,536 comparisons
SoapUI Pro Logo
7,440 views|3,886 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2019.
316,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.Selenium integration.It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.The ability to run a whole suite of tests automatically (which we did overnight).TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications.Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested.

Read more »

API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features.

Read more »

Cons
Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.Error handling features in the tool are a little limited.The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools.We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses.TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services.Product is not stable enough and it crashes often.

Read more »

The UI should be improved.Could integrate the graphing module for load testing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
316,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
33,892
Comparisons
12,536
Reviews
15
Followers
1,134
Avg. Rating
7.8
13th
Views
7,440
Comparisons
3,886
Reviews
4
Followers
301
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
SoapUI NG Pro
Learn
SmartBear
SmartBear
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
Offer
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about SoapUI Pro
Sample Customers
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company13%
Software R&D Company13%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company20%
Financial Services Firm16%
Retailer8%
Transportation Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
University13%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Software R&D Company13%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise37%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise65%
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2019.
316,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email