SmartBear TestComplete vs TFS

SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Test Management Tools with 15 reviews vs TFS which is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 28 reviews. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". The top reviewer of TFS writes "Can Provide A Centralized Place To Store All Source Code And Build Information For Entire Organization". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ. TFS is most compared with JIRA, Micro Focus ALM and CA Agile Central. See our SmartBear TestComplete vs TFS report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs TFS and others in Test Management Tools.
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SmartBear TestComplete vs TFS

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.Test items, project variables helps in managing automation suite and scheduling execution.Selenium integration.It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.The ability to run a whole suite of tests automatically (which we did overnight).TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications.Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested.

Read more »

From the project management perspective, the tool is efficiently managing teams by giving management information, such as reports, graphs, velocity, capacity, etc.The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.Build definitions and releases within the product. allow us to put our latest applications in the field.It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use.Complete integration with VS IDE and Office tools: This give us a possibility of high-level automation, thus minimizing human error.Version Control: TFS offers both the centralized “TFVC” version control technology as well as the distributed “Git” version control technology.I like its MTM (Microsoft Test Manager) section which gives us options to create various test plans and add test cases into it.The API for managing TFS programmatically is very powerful, you can listen on work items changes by TFS events.

Read more »

Cons
Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.Increased performance with less memory and CPU usage.Error handling features in the tool are a little limited.The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools.We were testing handheld barcode scanners running WindowsCE with many menus of warehouse functions, and our biggest problem was the timing between input and responses.TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services.Product is not stable enough and it crashes often.

Read more »

More options could be provided from the perspective of requirements management, which would help product owners to use the tool effectively.Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization.We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS.TFS on-premise does not support integration with SharePoint Online.Not all of the functionality, which is exposed by the command line interface (tf.exe) is available in the Visual Studio GUI.TFS and MTM have their own style of working and they are different from other tools like Jira or TestRail, which are simpler and easy to use.Sometimes we feel that it need more CPU, and RAMs on TFS server, either we implemented the hardware with the product minimum requirements.Microsoft should discontinue the use of SharePoint as I don’t really see any value add to TFS, document management features can be included in TFS web portal itself, if required!

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools.If running TFS on-premise is expensive, maybe you could consider moving to the Cloud and use the Visual Studio Team Services.Use the Microsoft recommended “seat-based” licensing model. This allows a single developer with multiple machines to consume only one client license.TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run.It's just as expensive as HPE ALM, without many of the features, best used for development tool only to avoid higher costs.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
29,416
Comparisons
13,318
Reviews
15
Followers
1,636
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
30,790
Comparisons
22,163
Reviews
27
Followers
1,348
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
Compared 64% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
See more TFS competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsTeam Foundation Server
Website/Video
Website/VideoSmartBear Software
Microsoft
Overview
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
OFFER
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
13%
Retailer
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
10%
Transportation Company
9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
40%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Software R&D Company
10%
Retailer
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Retailer
5%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
39%
Large Enterprise
46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
26%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
72%
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs TFS and others in Test Management Tools.
Download now
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email