SmartBear TestComplete vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 15 reviews vs Visual Studio Test Professional which is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. The top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Allows us to test both desktop and web applications". The top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "It needs to be independent and user-friendly". SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with UFT (QTP), Ranorex and Selenium HQ. Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, LoadRunner and UFT (QTP).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
295,587 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SmartBear TestComplete vs. Visual Studio Test Professional

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module.Buy modules on demand. If you have a four-person team and they will each automate tests only 25% of the time, it's better to buy a floating licence and share the tool during the work day.The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP.My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it.The product is becoming more and more expensive.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
295,587 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
30,821
Comparisons
12,784
Reviews
15
Followers
1,337
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
6,093
Comparisons
4,118
Reviews
1
Followers
282
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SmartBear TestComplete competitors »
See more Visual Studio Test Professional competitors »
Website/Video
Website/VideoSmartBear Software
Microsoft
Overview
Overview

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
OFFER
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Learn more about Visual Studio Test Professional
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company
13%
Software R&D Company
13%
Retailer
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
10%
Transportation Company
9%
No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
15%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
27%
Large Enterprise
58%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
295,587 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email