Snow Governance & Risk vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Snow Governance & Risk and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
33rd
out of 86 in GRC
Views
216
Comparisons
151
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
351
Comparisons
181
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Snow Governance and Risk
Accelus
Learn More
Snow Software
Video Not Available
Thomson Reuters
Video Not Available
Overview

Understanding and controlling your software data inventory is vital. Snow provides full visibility across the enterprise and more. It’s easy to see how many devices are in use; where they are; which applications are installed and who has access to them across on-premises, cloud and mobile devices. Specifically, Snow shows you which applications contain personal data and the type of personal data it is, allowing you to meet the requirements of many data protection regulations, including GDPR. When this powerful inventory data is cross referenced to the National Vulnerability Database and displayed on an intuitive dashboard, you can see exactly which vulnerabilities reside on your system and their criticality. Analysts predict that 99% of the vulnerabilities exploited by the end of 2020 will already be known. Snow gives you the insight you need to find them and focus remediation efforts on the most crucial.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Imperial Brands, TVO, informa, Bridgestone, UK Food Retailer, Velux, LSE, TalkTalk, Insta, Swedbank
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Snow Governance & Risk is ranked 33rd in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. Snow Governance & Risk is rated 0.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Snow Governance & Risk is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent and RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.