SoapUI Pro vs. UFT (QTP)

As of June 2019, SoapUI Pro is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. The top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "With this solution, we were able to develop tests about 3x faster than we did with Java". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Parasoft SOAtest and Katalon Studio. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our SoapUI Pro vs. UFT (QTP) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SoapUI Pro Logo
8,747 views|4,303 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
55,052 views|16,247 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SoapUI Pro vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
346,318 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation.

Read more »

Cons
The UI should be improved.Could integrate the graphing module for load testing.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.It doesn't support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this.You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
346,318 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
Views
8,747
Comparisons
4,303
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
287
Avg. Rating
8.5
1st
Views
55,052
Comparisons
16,247
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
742
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
SoapUI NG ProMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
SmartBear
Micro Focus
Overview
For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about SoapUI Pro
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm22%
Software R&D Company11%
Retailer11%
Hospitality Company11%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm31%
Manufacturing Company17%
Software R&D Company10%
Healthcare Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise57%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about SoapUI Pro vs. UFT (QTP) and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
346,318 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email