We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The cost is not that bad."
"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
Earn 20 points
SoapUI Pro is ranked 10th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. SoapUI Pro is rated 8.2, while ZAPTEST is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". On the other hand, SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Postman, Parasoft SOAtest, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, ReadyAPI, Tricentis Tosca and Ranorex Studio.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.