We performed a comparison between webMethods.io Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most interesting feature is its Mac-based function."
"The scalability is fine for our purposes."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"A complete integration suite and a good platform."
"The solution is open-source."
"It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability."
"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The price and the complexities attached to the solution are two areas of concern where improvements are required."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"WSO2 API Manager should improve its marketplace subscription model and documentation in order to reach a higher level in the market."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"WSO2 API Manager could increase their security compliance."
"From what I have experienced from the versions I have tried, they could improve on the multi-tenant environments to allow some kind of SSO single sign-on between tenant."
"API Manager is not easy to scale because some of its components lack scalability. It's a difficult point. Especially because companies are so cloud-based these days, microservice scalability is a major thing."
webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 7th in API Management with 33 reviews. webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and SSIS, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our WSO2 API Manager vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
