We performed a comparison between N-able Take Control and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."The most valuable part of N-able Take Control is being able to remotely access your customer's site. You are able to view their network. Once you have it set up, it's always available. N-able Take Control can be used even when other remote access controls have been made."
"Take Control enables you to collaborate with end users. It's for supporting a workstation where you want the person on the other side to see you moving their mouse, and you can work with them."
"TeamViewer allows us to do multiple controllers on a Host, which is great. We have a lot of Macs in our organization, and TeamViewer being cross-platform is a good thing."
"TeamViewer is a step ahead of solutions like, for example, AnyDesk."
"The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good."
"With an image, you can see immediately what's going on. You can run some tests. Without the solution, you need to do everything by telephone. It's not even thinkable."
"TeamViewer is useful for accessing data and systems remotely. Using this application, I can access other computers using an ID number that I provide to the users whose laptop I would like to access."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness."
"I am satisfied with TeamViewer, and its performance."
"It was worth the investment. You can do file transfers and video calls with it. You can do a lot of copy paste stuff. E.g., if I have a file and want to place it on somebody's machine, I can just copy it off of mine and paste it right on their machine. I don't have to put it in a Dropbox account and have them log into it to pull it off. I can do all that right through TeamViewer. When you're looking at the TeamViewer screen, you think you are working on your own machine."
"We've seen some latency problems in AWS environments. Aside from that, it's a pretty solid service."
"The dashboards I do not use because there are issues. The solution monitors your antivirus and other programs but it does not seem to work well."
"The security could improve in TeamViewer."
"We have a consultant that helps us do the virtual aspects of TeamViewer."
"The solution could improve by increasing or removing the time limitation on the use of a session."
"The solution could have better scalability."
"This solution could be improved by offering more flexibility in terms of usage."
"TeamViewer can improve connectivity. I had some problems connecting to my clients and now I use AnyDesk."
"I have noticed that when I access another person's computer, sometimes the tab is visible, and sometimes it is not, which can be difficult."
"I can use up to three computers, but sometimes I have four. So, it would be nice to have at least four computers."
N-able Take Control is ranked 19th in Remote Access with 2 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 84 reviews. N-able Take Control is rated 9.0, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able Take Control writes "Valuable remote access feature, highly stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". N-able Take Control is most compared with Dameware Remote Support and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Zoom.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.