Solr vs Swiftype [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
1,232 views|937 comparisons
Elastic Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Solr and Swiftype [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Search as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Search as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Swiftype [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The only costs in addition to the standard licensing fees are related to the hardware, depending on whether it is cloud-based, or on-premise."
  • More Solr Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 12 in Search as a Service
    Views
    1,232
    Comparisons
    937
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Search as a Service
    Buyer's Guide
    Search as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Search as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Amazon AWS CloudSearch logo
    Compared 49% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Elastic Search logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Algolia logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Learn More
    Apache
    Video Not Available
    Elastic
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.

    Swiftype Site Search:

    A fast, flexible search solution that helps you surface your website’s most relevant content to your audience, customers or users. Swiftype connects your users to the right content.

    Swiftype App Search:

    Get access to a set of robust APIs and unprecedented relevance controls to deliver amazing search experiences, all backed by the Elastic Stack. Swiftype makes it easy to build a world-class search experience.

    Sample Customers
    eHarmony, Sears, StubHub, Best Buy, Instagram, Netflix, Disney, AT&T, eBay, AOL, Bloomberg, Comcast, Ticketmaster, Travelocity, MTV Networks
    Asana, BulbAmerica, DramaFever, Engadget, Instructables, Shopify, TechCrunch, Twilio, UPS Battery Center, Harvard Law Review, Mapbox, Qualcomm, Shoppers Drug Mart, Signature Hardware, Twitch
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Search as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Search as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Solr is ranked 8th in Search as a Service while Swiftype [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Search as a Service. Solr is rated 7.8, while Swiftype [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Solr writes "Good indexing and decent stability, but requires more documentation". On the other hand, Solr is most compared with Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Amazon Kendra, Elastic Search, Azure Search and Algolia, whereas Swiftype [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.