Anonymous UserSolutions Consultant at a comms service provider
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco."
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"It is not cheap."
"We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support."
"It's not an expensive product."
"I am not happy with the pricing, it could be better."
"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."
"We pay for licensing the solution. It's my understanding that it is not overly expensive. It may be somewhere around $2,000 for a license."
Earn 20 points
Based on an innovative dynamic biplane multi-core parallel architecture and powered by Intel DPDK, Venusense NGFW provides T-bit non-blocking data processing capacity. Depend on the advantage of Venustech VSOS (Security Operating System) and high-performance integration processor, Venusense NGFW achieves deep integration of L4-L7 layer, which provides users with high performance and high reliability of the L4-L7 layer unified security protection.
Venusense NGFW supports linkage with VenusEye for real-time access to the latest threat intelligence. Through the Threat Intelligence Protection Module, Venusense NGFW recognizes high-risk domain names and IP on the Internet for the first time and protects them in the shortest possible time. Support large enterprise customers to build a on-promise threat intelligence cloud to protect against sensitive data.
Venusense NGFW can integrate with Venusense APT, providing in-depth defense against 0DAY/APT attacks. Based on certain rules, Venusense NGFW sends unidentifiable files to the APT engine which detects the unknown attacks or threatening files based on sandbox and four inspection engines.
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 7th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 16 reviews while Venusense NGFW is ranked 42nd in Firewalls. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 7.2, while Venusense NGFW is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Useful data quota features, but scalability is an issue and the signature database could be enhanced". On the other hand, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Sophos XG, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM, Cisco ASA Firewall and pfSense, whereas Venusense NGFW is most compared with .
See our list of .
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.