Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos Cyberoam UTM vs. WatchGuard XTM and other solutions. Updated: January 2019.
317,134 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The most valuable feature of this product is the threat protection.
It is a VPN that serves all your needs as an application firewall.
Web and content filtering are valuable in preventing people from abusing the network and pushing up the bandwidth price.
We have never had to restart a firewall. The firewalls have all worked perfectly fine.
The best feature is the flexibility the product offers, in terms of remote access. What we had before was a decentralized mechanism in our organization, but after having this product we were able to get the remote locations into the same LAN. We were able to control the bandwidth and were able to take virtual access of those machines and give them the support, as and when required.
Bandwidth Management and aggregation. It is valuable for combining two ISPs. Switching to a secondary/redundant ISP is thus seamless, in the event that the primary ISP goes down. The Bandwidth Management is also valuable for limiting heavy downloaders that may impact negatively on the experience of other users.
The product has helped control bandwidth utilization, as well as enhanced connectivity and security to remote locations.
User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options.
I like the hostwatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site.
I could still keep the data rates really high, up near the two gigahertz data speeds, without compromise on the security perimeters being acted simultaneously.
We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them.
Application Control is fantastic with over 2,500 applications and the granularity that we can either allow people to view but not be able to log on to Facebook; or view it and log onto it if they're in the marketing department, but not play Facebook games. There are all sorts of different options like that. So it's highly granular.
Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process.
They have a reporting system which can store data over a very long period of time. Not many other firewall vendors provide a reporting system, but if they do, like Fortinet does, then you've got buy that as an additional product and that can be more than twice as expensive as the initial investment in the firewall. And without reporting over a long-term period, you're just about wasting your time.
It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time.
It configures in all-in-one place.
The reporting should be improved as well as the backup.
Its scalability is not that great.
Cyberoam configuration is done through the browser, which is one of the places that viruses spread.
Once in a while, an unwanted email will slip in. You have to set your parameters to avoid that happening, but once in a while, an email has slipped past firewall. Once you update the firmware, you notice that it doesn't happen. If an email slips in, I get a little bit worried. I do get the report, but you just don't want that situation happening in the first place.
I would like to see a better content management pack and also the website searching should be better.
I have problems with the email filtering. Emails pass through without any filtering affecting them. When I get back to them and tell them this is the issue, they check everything and say it is not in their database signature and they have to update it. But you know, by that time, my user has already opened it.
There is a lot or room for improvement, because it is still not a fourth or fifth generation firewall. It lacks security features.
Needs a mail alert/notification when the device loses any of its connections, during ISP redundancy implementation.
The setting policies need improvement. It needs an easier way to do static NAT and check on what policy is being used for that specific traffic.
Setup of this solution is complex, it's not plug and play.
Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product.
WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job. The software could do it, but there's no hardware that allows that to happen at the moment. So it doesn't scale as well as some other products, that's for sure.
The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out.
Cloud-based central administration of all devices from one point would be nice
Syslog (Dimension) is focused on presentation, but needs more focus on utility like SonicWall syslog (GMS/Analyzer).
The VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting.
Pricing and Cost Advice
I have no comment about the pricing.
Prices are very high.
It is worth the value.
It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands.
The price is very competitive and the licensing is easy.
It is more expensive than cheap routers, but it offers a lot of functionality, and that warrants the price.
Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription.
It is very reasonably priced as compared to other solutions in the market.
The licensing and renewal is very expensive.
Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.
Very competitive pricing regarding throughput compared to other alternatives.
It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use.
Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network.
out of 48 in Firewalls
out of 48 in Firewalls
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
|Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.||Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection Ð but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.|
Learn more about Sophos Cyberoam UTM
Learn more about WatchGuard XTM
|Gulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council||AVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense|
Non Tech Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Mining And Metals Company7%
Financial Services Firm34%
Financial Services Firm36%
Import And Exporter7%