SpecFlow vs T-Plan comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Tricentis Logo
465 views|199 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
T-Plan Logo
53 views|51 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SpecFlow and T-Plan based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."
  • "SpecFlow is an open-source product."
  • More SpecFlow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.
    Top Answer:SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up might… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    465
    Comparisons
    199
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    7.3
    29th
    Views
    53
    Comparisons
    51
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SpecFlow+
    Learn More
    Overview

    SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

    Implement and manage every aspect of your testing process, providing a structured approach to testing at project and corporate levels.
    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
    Abraxas Informatik AG, AGCO GmbH, Beyond Trust, Bluebox, Bridgewater, Canon, Capita, Criminal Records Bureau, Euronext - NYSE Group, Eurostar International Ltd, EurotaxGlass, Fujitsu-Siemens, Gemini Observatory, NYSE Euronext, NWIPT, OCLC, Olea Medical, Watertek, Xerox Corporation, Xtrakter Ltd, Yodel - HDNL, Yoodoo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SpecFlow is ranked 9th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while T-Plan is ranked 29th in Test Management Tools. SpecFlow is rated 7.2, while T-Plan is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SpecFlow writes "Ensures efficient testing and validation of both business and technical requirements". On the other hand, SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest and TestRail, whereas T-Plan is most compared with .

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.