Compare SpecFlow vs. Zephyr Enterprise
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use SpecFlow? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Ask a question Earn 20 points | Top Answer: If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise. Top Answer: Their version of test cases can be improved. Right now, all updates just get the latest version. But there is no version in the test cases. You can only know the version based on your comparison. In… more » Top Answer: We use Zephyr Enterprise for the entire testing process from beginning to end. |
Ranking  | |
Views 205 Comparisons 92 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 5,133 Comparisons 3,544 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 507 Rating 9.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 46% of the time.  Compared 26% of the time. |  Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time. Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 1% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| SpecFlow+ | SmartBear Zephyr |
Learn | |
| Tricentis | SmartBear |
Overview | |
SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin. | Transform your organization and produce high quality software, quickly. Get to market faster, reduce risk and accelerate time to revenue. Future proof your test management investment with a platform that easily configures to your evolving processes. Legacy systems have no place in your agile business. They hinder more than they help. It is time to retire those legacy test management solutions with today’s technology, integrations, deployment models and a simplified licensing model. Measure. Analyze. Share. Elevate visibility across the organization. Make well-informed business decisions with real-time information that comes in from across your globally distributed teams. |
Offer | |
Learn more about SpecFlow | Learn more about Zephyr Enterprise |
Sample Customers | |
| Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank | Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Computer Software Company26% Comms Service Provider21% Financial Services Firm8% Government6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Microsoft, Tricentis and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2021.
456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SpecFlow is ranked 25th in Test Management Tools while Zephyr Enterprise is ranked 6th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews. SpecFlow is rated 0.0, while Zephyr Enterprise is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zephyr Enterprise writes "Useful for test case management and automation integration, but it should have a utility for automation integration". SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and TestRail by Gurock, whereas Zephyr Enterprise is most compared with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, TestRail by Gurock, TFS and Plutora.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.