Compare Spirent CyberFlood vs. Synopsys Defensics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
71,186 views|38,263 comparisons
Spirent CyberFlood Logo
1,341 views|882 comparisons
Synopsys Defensics Logo
1,296 views|609 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution."

More Veracode Pros »

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator.""Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

More Spirent CyberFlood Pros »

"The product is related to US usage with TLS contact fees, i.e. how more data center connections will help lower networking costs."

More Synopsys Defensics Pros »

Cons
"Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive."

More Veracode Cons »

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes.""I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

More Spirent CyberFlood Cons »

"Codenomicon Defensics should be more advanced for the testing sector. It should be somewhat easy and flexible to install."

More Synopsys Defensics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
Defensics, Codenomicon Defensics
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Defensics is a next-generation security testing platform that enables builders and users of technology to rapidly, reliably and efficiently find and correct dangerous errors and flaws. By proactively bringing the unknown into total view, Defensics sets the bar for superior vulnerability management.
Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Spirent CyberFlood
Learn more about Synopsys Defensics
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Digicel
Coriant, CERT-FI, Next Generation Networks
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm32%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Engineering Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider45%
Computer Software Company20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider36%
Computer Software Company35%
Financial Services Firm7%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise52%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 25th in Application Security with 2 reviews while Synopsys Defensics is ranked 2nd in Fuzz Testing Tools with 1 review. Spirent CyberFlood is rated 0.0, while Synopsys Defensics is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "Analyzes network security or even existing processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Synopsys Defensics writes "Product security tests for switches and router sections". Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint, Ixia BreakingPoint VE and ImmuniWeb, whereas Synopsys Defensics is most compared with Coverity, Ixia BreakingPoint, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Checkmarx and OWASP Zap.

See our list of .

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.