We compared Spring Boot and Vert.x based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Spring Boot is highly regarded for its straightforward setup and deployment, reliability, active community, and user-friendly interface for Java developers. Areas for enhancement include improved cloud integration, enhanced database connectivity, and better documentation. Vert.x is praised for its streamlined, adaptable design, scalability, and performance advantages, although users may encounter obstacles such as a challenging learning curve and limited documentation. Customers have reported a high return on investment, positive interactions with customer service, and intuitive deployment processes with both Spring Boot and Vert.x.
Features: Spring Boot offers comprehensive features for application development and seamless integration, while Vert.x is known for its efficient and adaptable architecture. Spring Boot simplifies setup and connectivity, while Vert.x showcases a powerful event-driven system and versatility with various programming languages.
Pricing and ROI: Spring Boot is more cost-effective in terms of setup compared to Vert.x, offering free usage and support options. The lack of licensing fees with Spring Boot makes it a preferred choice for users working on Java projects. Additionally, Vert.x may incur additional costs for deployment because of its smaller application footprint., Spring Boot and Vert.x each have different strengths when it comes to development and deployment. Spring Boot excels in streamlining development and deployment processes, allowing for quicker project completion. On the other hand, Vert.x prioritizes productivity, performance, scalability, and efficiency, ultimately leading to a significant return on investment.
Room for Improvement: Spring Boot stands out for its advanced cloud compatibility, seamless database access, smooth AI integration, and detailed guidance. On the other hand, Vert.x struggles with unclear guidance, slower performance, limited community assistance, difficulties in blending technologies, and a difficult learning curve for newcomers.
Deployment and customer support: Users appreciate Spring Boot for its ease and speed in setup, with deployment times that differ. On the contrary, Vert.x is commended for its smooth deployment, well-organized documentation, and adaptability in integration., Spring Boot has a robust online community and resources for self-help, while Vert.x has a fast and helpful support team for addressing user concerns.
The summary above is based on 30 interviews we conducted recently with Spring Boot and Vert.x users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
Earn 20 points
Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews while Vert.x is ranked 9th in Java Frameworks. Spring Boot is rated 8.4, while Vert.x is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". On the other hand, Spring Boot is most compared with Jakarta EE, Eclipse MicroProfile, Apache Spark, Open Liberty and Oracle Application Development Framework, whereas Vert.x is most compared with Jakarta EE, Apache Spark, Eclipse MicroProfile and Spring MVC.
See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.
We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.