SSIS vs webMethods Integration Server

SSIS is ranked 3rd in Data Integration Tools with 4 reviews vs webMethods Integration Server which is ranked 4th in Business Process Management with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of SSIS writes "SSIS 2016 - The good, the bad, and the ugly". The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Integration Suite and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Informatica, Microsoft and others in Data Integration Tools.
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SSIS vs webMethods Integration Server

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It has the ability to be deployed into the cloud through Data Factory, and run completely as a software as a service in the cloud.Built in reports show package execution and messages. Logging can also be customized so only what is needed is logged. There is also an excellent logging replacement called BiXpress that provides both historical and real-time monitoring which is more efficient and much more robust than the built-in logging capabilities. And none of this requires custom coding to make it useful unlike many other ETL tools.In SSIS, the scope is not only to handle ETL challenges, but it will allow us to do so many other tasks, such as DBA activities, scripting, calling any .exe or scripts, etc.

Read more »

We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed.I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well.Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API.It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console.I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods.

Read more »

Cons
A change in the metadata source cripples the whole ETL process, requiring each module to be manually reopened.You have to write push down join & lookup SQL to the database yourself via stored procedures or use of the SQL Task to get very high performance. That said, this is a common complaint for nearly all ETL tools on the market and those that offer an alternative such as Informatica offer them at a very expensive add-on price.SSIS can improve in handling different data sources like Salesforce connectivity, Oracle Cloud's connectivity, etc.

Read more »

We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods.The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that.The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution.​Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools.Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems.This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
t's incredibly cost effective, easy to learn the basics quickly (although like all ETL tools requires the traditional learning curve to get good at) and has an immense user base.

Read more »

Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client.Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.It is worth the cost.Initialy good pricing and good, if it comes to Enterprise license agreements.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
27,822
Comparisons
17,580
Reviews
4
Followers
1,258
Avg. Rating
6.5
Views
18,352
Comparisons
10,812
Reviews
16
Followers
995
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
See more SSIS competitors »
See more webMethods Integration Server competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSQL Server Integration Services
Website/Video
Website/VideoMicrosoft
Software AG
Overview
OverviewSSIS is a package is an organized collection of connections, control flow elements, data flow elements, event handlers, variables, parameters, and configurations, that you assemble using either the graphical design tools that SQL Server Integration Services provides, or build programmatically. You then save the completed package to SQL Server, the SSIS Package Store, or the file system, or you can deploy the ssISnoversion project to the SSIS server. The package is the unit of work that is retrieved, executed, and saved.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

OFFER
Learn more about SSIS
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersPKP Energetyka, UniCredit Bank, Mostar, waldwasser, Ashok leyland, Florida Atlantic University, Stadt Frankfurt am MainFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Non Profit
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Transportation Company
8%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
45%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
45%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
14%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
70%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Large Enterprise
89%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
16%
Midsize Enterprise
8%
Large Enterprise
76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Informatica, Microsoft and others in Data Integration Tools.
Download now
288,343 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email