StackPath WAF vs Sucuri comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
StackPath Logo
221 views|170 comparisons
Sucuri Security Logo
1,023 views|719 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between StackPath WAF and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."

More StackPath WAF Pros →

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing.""The initial setup was very easy.""The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization.""It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website.""I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server.""The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

More Sucuri Pros →

Cons
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."

More StackPath WAF Cons →

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section.""I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything.""Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives.""In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there.""It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance.""The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

More Sucuri Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
  • "Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
  • "The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
  • "It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."
  • More Sucuri Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites.
    Top Answer:The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement. It could provide high security to handle large traffic volumes for multiple websites.
    Top Answer:The initial setup was very easy.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
    Top Answer:The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    221
    Comparisons
    170
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    263
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    1,023
    Comparisons
    719
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Cloudflare logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    SiteLock logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    StackPath Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    StackPath
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    StackPath WAF integrates multiple technologies, including Advanced Browser Validation and IP Reputation and Custom Rules engines, into an intelligent firewall that can be customized to meet your specific protection profile.

    Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.
    Sample Customers
    Robotics Cats, Jewlr
    The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise28%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    StackPath WAF is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while Sucuri is ranked 20th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 6 reviews. StackPath WAF is rated 9.0, while Sucuri is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". StackPath WAF is most compared with AWS WAF, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Imperva DDoS and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.