We performed a comparison between StackPath WAF and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The product’s most valuable is WAF. The authentication feature helps us protect WordPress sites."
"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."
"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."
"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."
"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."
"The product’s performance for caching feature needs improvement."
"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."
"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."
"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."
"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."
"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."
"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."
StackPath WAF is ranked 23rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review while Sucuri is ranked 20th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 6 reviews. StackPath WAF is rated 9.0, while Sucuri is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of StackPath WAF writes "Stable product with an easy setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". StackPath WAF is most compared with AWS WAF, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Imperva DDoS and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.