Compare StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorPool

StarWind Virtual SAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 52 reviews while StorPool is ranked 6th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 5 reviews. StarWind Virtual SAN is rated 9.6, while StorPool is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of StarWind Virtual SAN writes "It is more flexible than most VSAN solutions. You can run it across two hosts. You don't need a third host observing it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StorPool writes "Gives us top performance from our cloud service with low latency". StarWind Virtual SAN is most compared with VMware vSAN, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and Nutanix, whereas StorPool is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, ScaleIO and StarWind Virtual SAN. See our StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorPool report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
StarWind Virtual SAN Logo
11,415 views|4,515 comparisons
StorPool Logo
2,965 views|1,272 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorPool and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It has given the company an almost zero possibility of downtime.The most valuable feature is the reliable storage replication, which enables me to create a robust infrastructure to run our business.StarWind vSAN is a great solution to create a redundant two-node-only Hyper-V cluster, both for domain or workgroup scenarios.We have experienced multiple hardware failures at one site and the fault-tolerant volume worked exactly as expected with zero downtime.When using new (warranty) servers, you can forget about the storage service for several years. The users will not even notice the failure of two servers out of three.A typical system administrator with minimal experience in Hyper-V, VMware, or Windows can do VSAN configuration and maintain VSAN operations.It allows me to configure High Availability and failover clustering with some fault tolerance, at a cost point that doesn’t break the bank for a small business budget.The most valuable feature of this solution is the support. They are excellent and you can learn a lot from the support team.

Read more »

The team behind it was very engaged and had the skills and ability to support a service provider.The two 10GE networks provide redundancy and increased performance as they serve as two separate networks doubling the throughput and doing multipathing and load balancing. We now have a high performance shared storage system which enables us to run on private cloud. Our previous system used bare-metal hardware, which provided high performance but inflexible management. Now we have best of both worlds, SSD-class performance with flexibility of a private cloud system.With StorPool we were able to build live failover on top of our LXC infrastructure. This allows us both to live-migrate containers between compute nodes without any downtime and, in case of an entire node suffering any type of failure, we can bring all containers back online within a minute on a spare compute node.The speed of the storage solution also allows us to provide service to applications that are ​very I/O ​intensive.

Read more »

Cons
New versions of this solution should be tested more thoroughly before the release as we had a few problems with one version due to a bug.I wish the sync after a failure, such as hardware failure or power-related issues, for example, was faster.Being able to run StarWind vSAN on top of any free UNIX operating system to build a resilient iSCSI/FTP/SMB storage system would be useful.If there was one feature I would like to see it would be a built-in subsystem for managing UPS backups shutdown procedures providing a way to initiate VM shutdown on all host servers, shut down the host servers, then put the fault-tolerant mirroring in standby, and finally shut down the StarWind SANs.For the StarWind VSA vSphere solution, I would like to see a simpler and automated virtual machine installation process in terms of network settings.This solution should be more self-sufficient, running without creating domains or failover clusters.I would like to see some additional, and possibly clearer, implementation videos with some slower and possibly more detailed descriptions of what the various steps of implementation are for someone who is unfamiliar with high availability and failover clustering in Windows.I wish there was online support because email return takes a long time and a faster solution should be found.

Read more »

Monitoring and statistics UI is a bit clumsy.At times we need to check the disks and do some minor operations. A friendlier user interface would be useful in such cases.It would be good if, with next releases, StorPool provide a better GUI for monitoring and statistics. This would make our experience even better and complete.he only place we feel they could improve is the time it takes to bring new features to production.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost, including OPEX, is lower compared to other solutions.The cost takes into account the number of nodes, so the size of the storage is not important.Licensing is easy and the whole package is cost-effective.There are two tiers of support and in my opinion, support is worth the cost.This solution has competitive prices and the implementation is very easy.The free version is great to use for labs or test environments.This solution has a great price for the functionality.Licensing is based on nodes rather than TBs, which means that the users are free to increase storage capacity without putting thought into licensing.

Read more »

StorPool software is cost-effective and gives us a pricing advantage over our competitors.StorPool's pricing and licensing model is very transparent. As always, one has to due his due diligence when choosing a product like distributed storage solutions.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
11,415
Comparisons
4,515
Reviews
52
Average Words per Review
516
Avg. Rating
9.7
Views
2,965
Comparisons
1,272
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
465
Avg. Rating
9.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 52% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
StarWind
StorPool
Overview

For SMB, ROBO, Cloud and Hosting providers, who look to cut down virtualization expenses, our solution is StarWind VSAN. It is software that eliminates any need in physical shared storage by basically “mirroring” internal hard disks and flash between hypervisor servers. There is less hardware to buy in general, consequently less money is spent on purchase and maintenance. The existing hardware is used with maximum efficiency, so there is no money wasted at all.

StarWind Virtual SAN targets those who already have servers, or are bound to a particular vendor list to buy from. In case there is a new virtualization infrastructure to be built from scratch, StarWind offers a much better way – StarWind HyperConverged Appliance. It is a turnkey solution complete with hardware and software, powered by StarWind Virtual SAN. Those who need to build and maintain virtualization infrastructure at little to no expense, may be interested in StarWind Virtual SAN Free.

StorPool is intelligent storage software that runs on standard servers and builds scalable, high-performance storage system out of these servers (software-defined storage). It focuses on the block-level storage and excels at it. It is incredibly flexible and can be deployed in both converged setups (on compute nodes, alongside VMs and applications) or on separate storage nodes.

StorPool has advanced fully-distributed architecture and is arguably the fastest and most efficient block-storage software on the market today. It is the best storage system when building a cloud.

Offer
Learn more about StarWind Virtual SAN
Learn more about StorPool
Sample Customers
Baker Tilly BVI, CMS Internet, Board Harpeth Hall SchoolCloudSigma, Kualo, Togglebox, Neterra, Serveo, Superhosting.bg, GroupOne, DRFortress, Metanet, Dia, Server Storage Solutions
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company10%
Construction Company8%
Software R&D Company8%
Engineering Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company18%
Comms Service Provider9%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Software R&D Company21%
Security Firm19%
Retailer11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise17%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business58%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise18%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind Virtual SAN vs. StorPool and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.