We performed a comparison between Statseeker and ThousandEyes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the simplicity of adding new devices into it."
"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."
"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"It's fairly easy to set up."
"The installation process is not hard at all."
"ThousandEyes gives companies better visibility."
"From our perspective, ThousandEyes stands out as an invaluable tool because of its deep and extensive capabilities."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution was the ability to see how the connection quality is between the sites and get an alert if it was turning bad."
"The authentication overall - including to the VPN and LAN - is excellent."
"The most valuable features are integration and ease of use."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"Once I fully use the tool 100%, I'm sure I would have something to critique, however, for now, I'm happy with it."
"It's an expensive solution."
"There is room for improvement in terms of customization and user-friendliness."
"It might be practical to extend monitoring capabilities to include network devices"
"The guest portal is hard to use."
"They only offer synthetic requests."
"It would be nice if the solution covered other areas like server monitoring."
"The tool does not provide features for application-level monitoring."
Statseeker is ranked 62nd in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews while ThousandEyes is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews. Statseeker is rated 8.2, while ThousandEyes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThousandEyes writes "Reliable. simple to set up, and offers fast monitoring capabilities". Statseeker is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, SCOM and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas ThousandEyes is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Dynatrace, Accedian Skylight, SolarWinds NPM and AppDynamics.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.