We performed a comparison between Statseeker and vRealize Network Insight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."
"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."
"If we deploy NSX it shows us how the workflow will flow in the organization, what the roadblocks are, and what we need to do to overcome those hurdles. When we run this product, it gives us reports which describe problems with physical switches. We work with the network team to get them all resolved."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to look at the traffic flows, to look at NetFlow data."
"The solution helps reduce time to value, increase performance, provide deep visibility, and easily manage networks."
"The most valuable feature for me is the different views that you can get when selecting an application or a VLAN. It shows you the traffic flows. It gives you a visual representation of something that, in text, just may not make as much sense."
"It allows us to see how the network devices function as well as to see network glitches or fluctuations or dropping of packets."
"The tool's ease of configuration and use and the availability of information and artifacts through professional services and the web are key factors that customers find valuable."
"It helps a lot because, until now, we didn't have the tools to figure out the micro level, VM-to-VM kind of traffic; that was not in the current environment. We could not figure out VM-to-VM communication from the other tools. This is the tool which gives us end-to-end transparency."
"It's user-friendly. It's similar to the GUI that most VMware products are moving to, and the consistency across those makes it easy to switch from one product to another. Also, the search bar at the top is plain text and it helps you, it guides you along with your search query, so that helps. The first day you're in there you can start building actual queries."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."
"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."
"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."
"That user interface for selecting things needs to be a little more intuitive."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."
"It just needs to be more reliable and more accurate. At some point, there are some things where it does not match properly."
"The virtual appliance has rebooted."
"The solution can be improved by making it more compatible with other brands, allowing for better integration."
"I want to be able to monitor a network flow that is approximately two weeks back, but I haven't found an easy way to do this."
"The solution is very much viewer centric and it would be nice if it would transcend just the virtual infrastructure."
"I would like to see more interoperability on the firewall and low balancer sides."
"Support could be much better."
"It needs to be a little easier to use and to understand the information it's putting out. That would make it more helpful. If you're not a network person you need to understand things like network policies and concepts. If you gave it to a regular admin, it would be nice if it were easier for them to pick up what is going on, understand the flows and whether or not stuff should be talking to each other, as opposed to just port groups and IP addresses."
Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews while vRealize Network Insight is ranked 23rd in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. Statseeker is rated 8.2, while vRealize Network Insight is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vRealize Network Insight writes "Provides deep analytical insights and makes migrations efficient with dependency mapping". Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas vRealize Network Insight is most compared with ThousandEyes, NETSCOUT vSTREAM, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, Zabbix and AppNeta by Broadcom.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
