We performed a comparison between StormRunner Functional (SRF) [EOL] and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
StormRunner Functional (SRF) [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. StormRunner Functional (SRF) [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". StormRunner Functional (SRF) [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.