We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare StorPool vs. SwiftStack

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
StorPool Logo
1,154 views|693 comparisons
SwiftStack Logo
1,863 views|1,339 comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"Creating snapshots within seconds for big disks has helped our different migration projects since it allows us to perform them in a short period of time."

More StorPool Pros »

"The SwiftStack Controller, which is the web UI, provides out of band management. This has been one of the best features of it. It allows us to be able to do upgrades and look at performance metrics. It is a top feature and reason to choose the product."

More SwiftStack Pros »

"I have personally met with multiple Storpool engineers and spoke about different options and features. There are too many features that we don't know or use yet. My recommendation would be to promote the new features and give users different examples of how they can be used and how we can benefit from them."

More StorPool Cons »

"The file access needs improvement. The NFS was rolled out as a single service. It needs to be fully integrated into the proxy in a highly available fashion, like the regular proxy access is. I know it's on the roadmap."

More SwiftStack Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The pricing model is great and makes sense. We have talked about how to get into more of a frequent billing cycle than once a year. That would be an interesting concept to add into the product, having the ability to have monthly billing instead of having to do a one-year licensing renewal. However, the way the license works by charging for storage consumed is definitely what makes them the most competitive.""Dollar per gigabyte, it costs us more because we are storing more. However, if you look at it from a cost per gigabyte perspective, we have dropped our costs significantly.""We are able to dynamically grow storage at a lower cost. We can repurpose hardware and buy commodity hardware. There is a huge cost savings, on average $100,000 a year compared to traditional storage for what we have at our size."

More SwiftStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Learn More
Video Not Available

StorPool is intelligent storage software that runs on standard servers and builds scalable, high-performance storage system out of these servers (software-defined storage). It focuses on the block-level storage and excels at it. It is incredibly flexible and can be deployed in both converged setups (on compute nodes, alongside VMs and applications) or on separate storage nodes.

StorPool has advanced fully-distributed architecture and is arguably the fastest and most efficient block-storage software on the market today. It is the best storage system when building a cloud.

SwiftStack enables you to do more with storage. Store more data, enable more applications and serve more users. We do this by delivering a proven object storage solution that's built on an open-source core and is fully enterprise ready. Our object storage software is an alternative to complex, expensive, on-premises hardware-based storage solutions. SwiftStack delivers the features and flexibility you need to easily manage and scale object storage behind your firewall. Customers are demanding storage where they can pay as they grow, find it is easier to consume, and can infinitely scale. Today, our customers use SwiftStack for archiving active data, serving web content, building private clouds, sharing documents and storing backups.
Learn more about StorPool
Learn more about SwiftStack
Sample Customers
CloudSigma, Kualo, Togglebox, Neterra, Serveo, Superhosting.bg, GroupOne, DRFortress, Metanet, Dia, Server Storage Solutions
Pac-12 Networks, Georgia Institute of Technology, Budd Van Lines
Top Industries
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider26%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company8%

StorPool is ranked 20th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review while SwiftStack is ranked 7th in File and Object Storage with 1 review. StorPool is rated 10.0, while SwiftStack is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of StorPool writes "Great service and support with a constant addition of new features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SwiftStack writes "We are able to dynamically grow storage at a lower cost". StorPool is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, StarWind Virtual SAN, VMware vSAN, LINBIT SDS and Zadara, whereas SwiftStack is most compared with MinIO, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, Scality RING8 and Pure Storage FlashBlade.

See our list of best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Software Defined Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.