Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sucuri Security Logo
0 views|4 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
w3af Logo
341 views|178 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sucuri and w3af based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, TitanHQ and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Domain Name System (DNS) Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
  • "Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
  • "The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
  • "It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."
  • More Sucuri Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Domain Name System (DNS) Security solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The initial setup was very easy.
    Top Answer:The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
    Top Answer:The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    0
    Comparisons
    4
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    341
    Comparisons
    178
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Cloudflare logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    SiteLock logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Comodo cWatch logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    StackPath WAF logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    w3af
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.
    w3af is a Web Application Attack and Audit Framework. The project's goal is to create a framework to help you secure your web applications by finding and exploiting all web application vulnerabilities. Our framework is proudly developed using Python to be easy to use and extend, and licensed under GPLv2.0.
    Sample Customers
    The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Media Company11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Domain Name System (DNS) Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Infoblox, TitanHQ and others in Domain Name System (DNS) Security. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sucuri is ranked 12th in Domain Name System (DNS) Security with 6 reviews while w3af is ranked 41st in Application Security Tools. Sucuri is rated 8.4, while w3af is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". On the other hand, the top reviewer of w3af writes "It's buggy and seems to try to do too many things, but having this on a USB drive has been valuable". Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, SiteLock, Comodo cWatch and StackPath WAF, whereas w3af is most compared with Acunetix.

    We monitor all Domain Name System (DNS) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.