We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Swarm64 vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The functionality is included in Windows Server licences."

More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which High Availability Clustering solutions are best for your needs.
541,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
78
Comparisons
37
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,569
Comparisons
759
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Swarm64
Video Not Available
Overview
Swarm64 seamlessly combines hard- and software into an engineered solution for greater business efficiency and performance. The S64DA is the out of the box solution to add analytical power to your relational databases.
Windows Server Failover Clustering provides infrastructure features that support the high-availability and disaster recovery scenarios of hosted server applications such as Microsoft SQL Server and Microsoft Exchange. If a cluster node or service fails, the services that were hosted on that node can be automatically or manually transferred to another available node in a process known as failover.
Offer
Learn more about Swarm64
Learn more about Windows Server Failover Clustering
Sample Customers
Alliance Venture, Target Partners, Investinor
Karl-Franzens-Universit_t Graz, NAV CANADA, Magnachip, ólectricit_ de France, Cambridgeshire Constabulary, Bank Alfalah Ltd., Local Government Association of Queensland
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider24%
Manufacturing Company8%
Retailer6%

Swarm64 is ranked 8th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 2 reviews. Swarm64 is rated 0.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "Good reliability and scalability, however the licensing is confusing". Swarm64 is most compared with , whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD, HPE Serviceguard and IBM PowerHA System Mirror.

See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.

We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.