Compare SWIFTnet FIN vs. WebOTX

SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware while WebOTX which is ranked 18th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFTnet FIN is rated 0, while WebOTX is rated 0. On the other hand, SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct, whereas WebOTX is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SWIFTnet FIN Logo
900 views|490 comparisons
WebOTX Logo
448 views|125 comparisons
Ranking
Views
900
Comparisons
490
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
448
Comparisons
125
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
SWIFT
Video Not Available
NEC
Overview

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

WebOTX is designed to handle the arrival of the cloud computing age, SaaS, and virtualization. Based on leading-edge technologies and proven results, WebOTX helps set up systems that are always available, are adaptable to change, and utilize leading-edge technologies to achieve a new kind of business and new way of living.

Offer
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Learn more about WebOTX
Sample Customers
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, VolvoYokohama City, Nagasaki City
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: July 2019.
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email