SWIFTnet FIN vs WebOTX comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SWIFT Logo
1,036 views|844 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
NEC Logo
29 views|23 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SWIFTnet FIN and WebOTX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
OleksiiShcherbatiuk
Ranking
Views
1,036
Comparisons
844
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
29
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

WebOTX is designed to handle the arrival of the cloud computing age, SaaS, and virtualization. Based on leading-edge technologies and proven results, WebOTX helps set up systems that are always available, are adaptable to change, and utilize leading-edge technologies to achieve a new kind of business and new way of living.

Sample Customers
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Yokohama City, Nagasaki City
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm58%
Computer Software Company9%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer4%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise82%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Business-to-Business Middleware
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware while WebOTX is ranked 24th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0, while WebOTX is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". On the other hand, SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct, whereas WebOTX is most compared with .

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.