We performed a comparison between SAP SQL Anywhere and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SAP SQL Anywhere is very helpful."
"We've found the solution very reliable overall. It's very fast."
"The auto-backup replication is a perfect feature. That is the feature I liked the most."
"It works well in general."
"The most valuable features of SAP SQL Anywhere are the ease of use and the user interface is intuitive."
"A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts."
"When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration."
"I found all parts --loading, transformation, processing & querying work in parallel, and end-to-end-- to be valuable."
"The key advantages are Performance when processing Terabytes of data and scalability."
"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."
"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."
"Auto-partitioning and indexing, and resource allocation on the fly are key features."
"The functionality of the solution is excellent."
"We have had some stability issues with SAP SQL Anywhere, but I am not sure if it is an application or network issue. We sometimes have a large amount of data being queried and it cannot handle it."
"A problem we are experiencing now is when doing a backup in SQL 2012 and 14."
"SAP SQL Anywhere needs to incorporate functionalities like SAP S/4HANA."
"It is not as secure as it could be."
"The interface is not easy in comparison to the SQL Server. It could be more user-friendly."
"It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"Sometimes the large injestion takes days to load data, and some of our stored procedures take two to three days."
"The following could be better: licensing, architecture openness, integration with other tools."
"The increasing volumes of data demand more and more performance."
"Teradata should focus on functionality for building predictive models because, in that regard, it can definitely improve."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata."
SAP SQL Anywhere is ranked 20th in Relational Databases Tools with 6 reviews while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. SAP SQL Anywhere is rated 7.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP SQL Anywhere writes "Reliable and able to expand but needs to be more secure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". SAP SQL Anywhere is most compared with SQL Server, SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, MySQL, Oracle Database and MariaDB, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our SAP SQL Anywhere vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.