Symantec Endpoint Encryption vs Trustwave Encryption [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Trustwave Encryption [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Endpoint Encryption.
To learn more, read our detailed Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It can be expensive. However, if you plan to scale or are at a large enterprise company, this product could be what you need."
  • "The licensing costs yearly are $5000."
  • "They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options."
  • "Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."
  • "The pricing is fair but there is variability in our area that needs to be addressed."
  • "The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."
  • "The license is not very expensive."
  • "There is a license required for this solution."
  • More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protection… more »
    Top Answer:One notable aspect is the ability to customize alerts and other settings.
    Top Answer:We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range. I would rate it around three or four in terms of cost-effectiveness. However, deploying these servers… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 28 in Endpoint Encryption
    Views
    2,841
    Comparisons
    2,166
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    341
    Rating
    6.9
    Unranked
    In Endpoint Encryption
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Symantec Drive Encryption
    Learn More
    Overview
    Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.
    Trustwave Managed Encryption Services help customers control access to sensitive data so they can achieve regulatory compliance, reduce the liability of publicly disclosing data breaches and protect valuable intellectual property. Trustwave Encryption is a single product that protects information across the enterprise.Rather than a collection of applications pieced together on a platform, our solution is one integrated product with revolutionary encryption technology for full disk, removable media and email attachments. Trustwave Managed Encryption provides automatic encryption, key management and logging, while your on-site administrative console gives you real-time reporting and user management capabilities.
    Sample Customers
    Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency
    New York Hotel, Hungry Howies, InterGraph, Schiotzky's, Magnolia Hotels, Qdoba Mexican Grill
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm56%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government6%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Endpoint Encryption
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 7th in Endpoint Encryption with 33 reviews while Trustwave Encryption [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Encryption. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 7.6, while Trustwave Encryption [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Robust data protection with user-friendly deployment, competitive pricing, and comprehensive features like customizable alerts and effective detection capabilities but needs GUI improvements". On the other hand, Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Digital Guardian and ESET Endpoint Encryption, whereas Trustwave Encryption [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

    We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.