Compare Symantec Endpoint Encryption vs. ZENworks

Symantec Endpoint Encryption is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Encryption with 10 reviews while ZENworks is ranked 17th in Endpoint Encryption. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is rated 8.0, while ZENworks is rated 0. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Encryption writes "Has good messaging features but the hard drive encryption needs to be improved". On the other hand, Symantec Endpoint Encryption is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Cisco AMP for Endpoints and ESET Endpoint Encryption, whereas ZENworks is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Cisco AMP for Endpoints.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use ZENworks? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Symantec, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side.The pricing is fair but there is variability in our area that needs to be addressed.Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive.They have two solutions for encryption including Symantec Endpoint Encryption and PGP Endpoint Encryption. With one PGP license, you can deploy the two solutions. The PGP license gives you two options.The licensing costs yearly are $5000.It can be expensive. However, if you plan to scale or are at a large enterprise company, this product could be what you need.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 27 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
6,714
Comparisons
5,735
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
558
Avg. Rating
7.9
17th
out of 27 in Endpoint Encryption
Views
442
Comparisons
319
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 72% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Symantec Drive Encryption
Learn
Symantec
Micro Focus
Overview
Symantec Drive Encryption, powered by PGP technology provides organizations with strong full-disk and removable media encryption and the ability to integrate with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. Intuitive management enables enterprise scale deployments and features compliance-based, out-of-the-box reporting plus customizable reports. Management capabilities include support for native OS encryption (FileVault2) and Opal compliant self-encrypting drives.ZENworks Full Disk Encryption (formerly Novell ZENworks Full Disk Encryption) reduces the cost of deploying, managing, and troubleshooting encrypted laptops and desktops. It has automated data protection that locks out threats. It manages encrypted devices remotely and cut travel costs. Avoids security breaches and stay out of the news and gives IT staff a familiar management environment.
Offer
Learn more about Symantec Endpoint Encryption
Learn more about ZENworks
Sample Customers
Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension AgencyCSC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Symantec, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption. Updated: February 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.