Symantec Privileged Access Manager vs Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Symantec Privileged Access Manager and Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Don’t go with an agent model. Don’t go with a model that has you buying a thousand different parts. Go with PAM that gives you everything, or you’ll just be paying costs of implementing another tool that PAM would have just given you up front."
  • "The prices are not low, but one can ask for a discount. It’s not the cheapest PAM solution."
  • "Appliances are relatively cheap, don’t skimp. Make sure you have redundancy, high availability, and enough appliances to manage the concurrent workload."
  • "Cost-wise, CA was better compared to others in the market. ​"
  • "Pricing is fair compared to other top vendors."
  • "The licensing is simple and scalable."
  • "I would prefer better licensing options for the 20-100 users we have at a given time."
  • "It is more expensive than other solutions on the market."
  • More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We can check the activities in the server for fragile files and documents in case of any issues.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing depends on the agreement. They offer per-device, per-user, or monthly and yearly licensing models.
    Top Answer:There should be some training platform similar to Microsoft and IBM. We can't find useful documentation or YouTube videos to learn about the process. They should include some assignments in the test… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    901
    Comparisons
    571
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    6.7
    Unranked
    In Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager
    Learn More
    Delinea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CA Privileged Access Manager is a simple-to-deploy, automated, proven solution for privileged access management in physical, virtual and cloud environments. It enhances security by protecting sensitive administrative credentials such as root and administrator passwords, controlling privileged user access, proactively enforcing policies and monitoring and recording privileged user activity across all IT resources.  It includes CA PAM Server Control (previously CA Privileged Identity Manager) for fine-grained protection of critical servers

    Thycotic Group Management Server empowers non-IT Business managers to securely manage their department's Active Directory Groups without assigning them to a privileged account.

    Using Group Management Server business department heads can easily manage their AD groups, ensuring the right people are included in their email groups, giving their staff the correct access to file systems. Group Management Server provides attestation of who has access to what, a major benefit in demonstrating proper governance and risk management.

    Sample Customers
    NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft
    BAE Systems, Microsoft Game Studios, Adobe, USDA, Honda, Back United, Garmin, Activision, NATO, NPR, Vistaprint, HubSpot, Kellogg's, AT&T, Kaplan Medical, AAA, Netflix, De Beers
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer20%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Logistics Company15%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise79%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 18th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 50 reviews while Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 7.8, while Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Allows IT and consultants to access the infrastructure environment but needs more security and better support". On the other hand, Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ARCON Privileged Access Management and Delinea Secret Server, whereas Thycotic Group Management Server [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.