Synopsys API Security Testing vs Synopsys Code Dx comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo
491 views|339 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Synopsys Logo
520 views|435 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Synopsys API Security Testing and Synopsys Code Dx based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."

More Synopsys API Security Testing Pros →

"The customers were looking for something around static security and dynamic security, and in all those areas, they were looking for an industry leader with a proven solution. Synopsys is a Gartner leader, so I position this particular technology for the technical pre-sales part of it."

More Synopsys Code Dx Pros →

Cons
"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."

More Synopsys API Security Testing Cons →

"The initial setup is a bit challenging because things are not easy. It needs a lot of technology adaptability plus the customer's environment-specific use cases."

More Synopsys Code Dx Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is more of an enterprise solution for budget-conscious customers. So, it's moderately priced. It's not for everybody."
  • More Synopsys Code Dx Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares.
    Top Answer:The solutions pricing model is based on the number of lines of code. Overall it is priced well, it is reasonable.
    Top Answer:We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business.
    Top Answer:The customers were looking for something around static security and dynamic security, and in all those areas, they were looking for an industry leader with a proven solution Synopsys is a Gartner… more »
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing model an eight out of ten, where one is low and ten is high. Because it is more of an enterprise solution for budget-conscious customers. So, it's moderately priced. It's not… more »
    Top Answer:Code Dx lacks one aspect, the dynamic security part, known as DAST. It's not an on-premise solution; it's in the cloud now. There are compliance standards and data standards where the customer might… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    491
    Comparisons
    339
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    310
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    520
    Comparisons
    435
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Synopsys
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
    APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

    Code Dx by Synopsys works with Intelligent Orchestration to give organizations the ability to: Execute tests and automatically run AppSec tools. Correlate results from multiple tools, combining security issues found by 75+ tools. Prioritize security issues, filtering out noise using machine learning.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Insurance Company12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Synopsys API Security Testing is ranked 29th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while Synopsys Code Dx is ranked 30th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Synopsys API Security Testing is rated 7.0, while Synopsys Code Dx is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Synopsys API Security Testing writes "Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Synopsys Code Dx writes "Facilitates continuous assessment of applications, covering both static and dynamic security aspects". Synopsys API Security Testing is most compared with Seeker, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix and OWASP Zap, whereas Synopsys Code Dx is most compared with Veracode, Checkmarx One, Coverity, SonarQube and Acunetix.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.