We performed a comparison between Talend Open Studio and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was quite straightforward. The deployment took between two and three days."
"The most valuable features are definitely data integration, data preparation, and data stewardship."
"Open Studio's best features are that it's user-friendly, even for beginners, and very easy to implement."
"A helpful feature for us is the integration with NoSQL databases."
"The most valuable feature of Talend Open Studio is the tMap component. There is a lot of functionality in one component."
"The rapidity of integration with data may be one of the valuable features."
"It's a good tool. It has the ability to take apart and install whatever we need. It's very good for data, transformation, and loading."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The product is very stable."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"It is complicated to understand the configuration process for email components."
"The price for Talend Data Integration should be less expensive."
"The security features could be improved."
"It doesn't have the ability to keep the repository of the source code (visual pipeline). It can be integrated with Git."
"We need more components to be more efficient. We use a lot of components, such as Salesforce, and it's not easy to use. There's are minor bugs and it's not easy to use some of the features."
"There used to be many Youtube channels that offered Talend training, but now there don't seem to be any. The solution should offer more online training resources."
"Talend Open Studio is in Java language, and right now, you can only use the debug functionality in Java. I see that people who know programming languages other than Java currently face difficulties."
"As for improvement or additional features, I would like to know how to use Java in Talend and also how to use Talend in the cloud or in big data. I would prefer to have storage directly on Talend."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"It is quite expensive."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Talend Open Studio is ranked 5th in Data Integration with 47 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 60 reviews. Talend Open Studio is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Talend Open Studio writes "An open-source ETL tool, when deployed on-premises, requiring an easy installation phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Talend Open Studio is most compared with SSIS, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory and Talend Data Fabric, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with webMethods.io Integration, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Oracle Service Bus. See our Talend Open Studio vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.