Compare TalentLMS vs. Ziiva Prosperity LMS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
TalentLMS Logo
290 views|231 comparisons
Ziiva Prosperity LMS Logo
60 views|18 comparisons
Ranking
Views
290
Comparisons
231
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
60
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Prosperity LMS
Learn More
Ziiva
Video Not Available
Overview

TalentLMS is an award-winning Learning Management System (LMS) ideal for delivering engaging online training. Create courses in a few clicks in a platform suitable for sophisticated as well as inexperienced, aspiring trainers. TalentLMS combines support for multiple file types and multimedia (presentations, videos, iFrame, SCORM, etc.) with simplicity, and an always eager-to-help support team. Be the driver of your team's potential.

Ziiva Prosperity is a Learning Management System (LMS) that provides a robust, fully customizable e-learning platform to: train employees and students and customers, on-board new team members, sell content online and track and document user interaction.
Offer
Learn more about TalentLMS
Learn more about Ziiva Prosperity LMS
Sample Customers
DeLonghi, Infosys, Rosetta Stone, Harper Collins Publishers, Zalora, Triton Aerospace, Smart Aviation Services
FedEx, IAMB

TalentLMS is ranked 13th in Learning Management Systems while Ziiva Prosperity LMS is ranked 34th in Learning Management Systems. TalentLMS is rated 0.0, while Ziiva Prosperity LMS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TalentLMS is most compared with Moodle, Google Classroom, Canvas LMS and Wombat Security Education Platform, whereas Ziiva Prosperity LMS is most compared with .

See our list of best Learning Management Systems vendors.

We monitor all Learning Management Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.